A witness of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Atiku Abubakar, Hitler Nwala, has accused the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of deliberately deleting results on Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) machines.
Nwala, a digital forensic analyst from Abuja, was called in by the petitioners’ lead counsel, Chris Uche, to testify against INEC, President Bola Tinubu and All Progressives Congress (APC).
During cross-examination, the witness told the court that he had prepared a forensic report of the presidential election after inspecting 110 BVAS equipment in Abuja. He claimed the BVAS machines inspected had all their results deliberately deleted.
Also, Atiku and PDP tendered a series of EC8A forms certified true copies for Ogun with 20 LGAs, Ondo with 17 LGAs, Jigawa with 27 LGA and Rivers with 20 LGAs as evidence which Justice Haruna Simon Tsammani admitted as exhibits in evidence.
The forensic expert who was the 26th witness for Atiku, maintained during cross-examination by INEC’s lawyer, Abubakar Mahmoud, that it was unnecessary for the electoral body to have deleted the presidential election result data from BVAS machines used in the FCT because the FCT did not hold governorship elections.
The witness told the court he examined 110 BVAS machines as sample material from the FCT and submitted a report of his investigation carried out on the BVAS.
The report was subsequently admitted as evidence and marked as exhibits, despite objections by the respondents in the matter.
Thereafter, the petitioners tendered a certificate of compliance to indicate that the report had complied with the Evidence Act.
Nwuala, who is a subpoenaed witness to the court, said during cross-examination that since there is a deviation in the small sample space of 110 samples analysed, “it is likely to increase as the number of sample size increases.”
The expert witness asserted that his findings showed that the election results of the Federal Capital Territory during the presidential elections were deliberately deleted from the BVAS machine.
He told the court that he “worked on 110 BVAS machines, which formed the primary source of information for his forensic report.”
He said that the machines inspected were only those from the FCT and that he did not know at what point the results were deleted from the machines.
Under cross-examination by Abubakar Mahmoud, counsel to INEC, the witness said that he attached a standard device to the BVAS machine to carry out his investigation.
However, INEC challenged his allegation, insisting that because he did not inspect all the machines, his claim was wrong, but the witness maintained his stance.
Mahmoud presented to the court, for demonstration, a BVAS machine, which he asked the witness to access and show proof that the data was deleted.
The witness said it was professionally wrong for him to access the machine directly.
He said: “We don’t access the source of evidence directly. We extract the evidence and access it from another source.
“If we access it now, the content will change and will tamper with the evidence. It is professionally wrong to tamper with evidence that will be relied upon in a court of law.”
INEC insisted the BVAS must be inspected in court. But the chairman of the five-man panel, Justice Haruna Simon Tsammani informed the counsel that the allotted time for conducting his cross-examination had elapsed.
Meanwhile, counsel for Tinubu, Wole Olanipekun, pointed out disparities in the forensic report concerning the number of machines inspected by the witness.
The senior advocate hinted that the report could equally be riddled with errors, but the witness told the court that the differences dictated in the numbers were typographical errors.
Meanwhile, Atiku and his party continued their battle against the declaration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as the winner of the election with the tendering of certified exhibits in four more states of the federation.
The exhibits tendered are certified true copies of INEC’s Form EC8A used by the electoral body during the presidential election.
The sensitive documents were tendered in 20 local government areas of Ogun, 17 local government areas of Ondo, 27 local government areas of Jigawa, and 20 local government areas of Rivers State.
Although the admissibility of the exhibits was vehemently opposed by INEC, Tinubu, and the All Progressives Congress (APC), who are the three respondents in the petition, the court went ahead and admitted them.
Further hearings on the petition have been adjourned until Friday, June 23
