Indications have emerged on why several senators are bitter with President Muhammadu Buhari on N8.612 trillion 2018 Budget proposal.
It was reliably gathered that senators are angry as result of the failure of Buhari’s administration to implement the constituency projects in the 2017 budget, two months to the expiration of the budget.
The lawmakers expressed dissatisfaction with the plan by the Federal Government to roll over many capitals budget in the 2017 budget proposal, which include constituency projects, a year to the general elections.
A reliable source close to the lawmakers said there is nothing on ground in their constituencies to campaign with for their return to the National Assembly.
During the debate on the budget proposal on the floor of the Senate on Tuesday, it was observed that senators criticized the budget proposal across party lines.
First to speak on the budget proposal was Senator Eyinnaya Abaribe (Abia-PDP), who described the revenue projection of N11 trillion in the budget as unrealistic.
According to Abaribe: “Since the 2018 budget is projected to consolidate on the gains made by the 2017 budget and the 2017 budget performance percentage is just about 15 per cent, automatically the 2018 Budget proposals are done on wrong projections, which to me is dead on arrival.”
However, the Senate leader, Senator Ahmad Lawan, objected to Abaribe’s comment on the revenue projection.
Also speaking against the budget, Senator Joshua Lidani said the revenue projection in the budget is nothing but building on quick sand and very weak foundation.
Senator Abubakar Yusuf wondered whether the President ever gives any of the budget proposals prepared for him by bureaucrats consideration before presenting them to the National Assembly going by the yearly heavy shortfalls in revenue projections
Yusuf said rather than for the Presidency to critically look into what can be done in making agencies responsible for non oil revenue generation to brace up, it keeps projecting unrealisable revenue collections on yearly basis as experienced this year where only N155 billion was realised out of the projected N807 billion independent revenue generation.
The ICON Newspaper re-brands, changes name to The Witness
Fastest growing Nigerian tabloid, The Icon has changed its name to The Witness as part of its re-branding process to serve its teeming readers better.
According to its managing director, Mr. Julius Akpovire Enyeh, the news medium headquartered in Lagos, in a bid to expand its reach, decided on a lot of changes, one which is the change of name that also affects its online version.
Akpovire said the readers and followers of the king of the newsstands were in for a refreshing experience as a result of the new changes. He also assured all of sustaining the newspaper’s continued tradition of churning out unbiased reports and on-time news dissemination as well as leading in delivering breaking news as they happen.
The Witness is available in newspaper tabloid form and online at www.witnessngr.com
The Witness is a new publication in newspaper tabloid format that covers News, Business, Politics, Health, Fashion, Entertainment and Sport. As part of its name indicates, the major focus of the newspaper is on happenstances around Nigeria, and other parts of the world to report interesting news as it breaks.
We won’t suspend anti-grazing law in Ekiti, Fayose replies defence minister
Governor Ayodele Fayose of Ekiti state, has said that the call by Mansur Dan Ali, minister of defence, that states should suspend the implementation of the anti-grazing law is an affront to federalism practised in the country.
The minister who made the call at a security meeting with President Muhammadu on Tuesday, said there was need to negotiate safe routes for the herders.
“The need to employ other channels with the affected states to reduce tension by suspending the implementation of the anti-open grazing law while also negotiating safe routes for the herders,” Gusau, spokesman of the minister, quoted Dan-Ali as saying.
But in a series of tweets on Tuesday, Fayose wondered why it is difficult for the federal government to support cattle ranching.
The governor said the federal government should be concerned with finding a way of taking the herdsmen out of the bush in view of giving them a better life through ranching.
“Call by the FG through the minister of defence, Dan-Ali that states should suspend implementation of the anti-grazing law is an affront on federalism that is practised in Nigeria. It is amazing that at the level of the presidency, they still see states as appendages of the FG,” he tweeted.
“January this year, the minister of defence blamed passage of anti-grazing law in some states as the cause of killings by herdsmen. Today, he is still singing the same song. Is there something to this old system of nomadic cattle rearing that they are not telling Nigerians?
“Why is @MBuhari not rearing his cows through open grazing? Why is it so difficult for the FG to support cattle ranching? Here in Ekiti, the anti-open grazing law stays. It is the presidency that should stop looking the other way while herdsmen go about killing Nigerians.
“Me thinks the Presidency should be concerned about how to take the herdsmen out of the bush and give them decent life by embracing cattle ranching. How can anyone be pleased subjecting his own people to a life of following cows through the bush from Yobe to Lagos?” Fayose said.
Tribunal upholds Gov. Obiano’s election
The Anambra governorship election petition tribunal has upheld the election of Governor Willie Obiano in the Nov. 18, 2107 polls.
It will be recalled that Praise Okechukwu, candidate of the Mega Progressives Peoples Party in her petition prayed the tribunal to annul Obiano’s victory for non-substantial compliance to the electoral act.
The All Progressives Grand Alliance and the Independent National Electoral Commission were also respondents in the suit.
Justice H. A Olusiyi, chairman of the tribunal in a unanimous judgment ruled that the petitioner had not proven her case substantially to invalidate the election.
Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN), counsel to Obiano, described the judgment as welcome as the election in question was the best in the history of Anambra and that the victory was convincing.
Ikpeazu said it was the institutional right of the petitioner to have contested the poll but it was not necessary.
He said: “It was the confirmation that the past election was about the best in Anambra.”
Emeka Etiaba (SAN), counsel to INEC, also lauded the tribunal for a job well done.
Etiaba said: “You know there were three petitions, we raised preliminary objections and based on that, one was struck out and in its wisdom, the tribunal decided to hear these other ones and one of them has been decided in our favour today.”
On his part, Nkem Ekweozoh, counsel to Okechukwu, said he would appeal the ruling as he was not satisfied with the decision.
Ekweozoh said some aspects of his petition were not addressed in his application to inspect sensitive materials which INEC refused to make available to him.
NEWS16 hours ago
Breaking: DSS arrests Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe
NEWS2 days ago
OAU dismisses professor involved in sex-for-mark scandal
NEWS11 hours ago
False age declaration: Documents clear HoS over wrongdoing, border agency boss faces sack
BUSINESS2 days ago
Decade old story wins GTBank’s Dusty Manuscript Contest
NEWS2 days ago
Reps to Buhari: ‘We are not your rubber stamp’
BUSINESS2 days ago
CBN boosts Forex market with $210 million
BUSINESS2 days ago
Dangote pays 90% of net profits as dividend, shareholders get N10.50 per share payout
NEWS17 hours ago
Oshiomhole unopposed for APC chair as Ebri withdraws